My current research looks at how the epistemology of inquiry can inform normative democratic theory, but I occasionally delve into topics in philosophy of mind. I have also worked extensively on the norms that govern philosophical inquiry.
Find me on
Papers
- The Suspension Problem for Epistemic Democracy
The Philosophical Quarterly
- Can We Talk it Out?
Episteme
- Philosophical Dimensions of the Trial (co-editor of SI)
American Philosophical Quarterly
- The Problem of Intuitive Presence
Philosophers' Imprint
- Why Understanding-why is Contrastive
Synthese
- No Hope for the Irrelevance Claim
Philosophical Studies
- Testing for the Phenomenal
Mind & Language
- #1 :
- Shows that a zetetic view of democracy solves a tension between requirements to suspend political belief and core democratic commitments.
- #2 :
- Argues that even when acting reasonably and in good faith, citizens can be anti-democratic if they violate zetetic norms of political decision-making
- #3 :
- What does it mean to have a skillful intuition? This paper shows that an enactivist account of intuition aptly answers this question.